Hematoma Evacuation Outcome in Patients with Spontaneous Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Robert Sinurat, Ahmad Faried

Abstract


The mortality rate of spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation is still high and varies in all neurosurgical centers. Currently, minimally invasive surgery to evacuate bleeding has become an option, but not all neurosurgical centers can perform the procedures due to limited resources. In addition, there are several guidelines for determining which patients will undergo a surgery. This study assessed the outcome of selected patients who were operated on using micro neurosurgical procedures or external ventricular drainage for intraventricular hemorrhage between 2016 and 2021. Patients included in this study were recruited from a hospital in Jakarta, Indonesia and  selected based on the guideline of the 2015 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA). The outcome was assessed by a modified Rankin scale (mRS). There were 301 patients with hemorrhagic stroke but only fifty patients were matched the criteria in the guideline. Male patients constituted the majority of the patients (n=28, 56%) and hypertension has occurred in 37 (74%) patients. The hematoma was mostly located in the intracerebral with intraventricular extension (n=27, 54%) patients. The pre-operative Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 23 (46%) patients were comatose and the other was 9–13. Postoperatively, there were 37 (74%) patients with a scale of 13–15, but 10 (20%) patients died. Pair t-test of the preoperative and postoperative scales showed a significant difference, p < 0.01. The outcome of 40 (80%) patients was good (modified Rankin scale of 0–3), and the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was -0.739 with the Sig.2-tailed was <0.01. The outcome of spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation is good when selecting patients following the 2015 AHA/ASA guideline and there is a strong correlation between postoperative GCS with 3-month mRS results.

Keywords


Intracerebral hemorrhage, guidelines, modified Rankin scale, outcome

Full Text:

PDF

References


  1. An SJ, Kim TJ, Yoon BW. Epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical features of intracerebral hemorrhages: an update. J Stroke. 2017;19(1):3–10.
  2. Bhaskar MK, Kumar R, Ojha B, Sing SK, Verma N, Verma R, et al. A randomized controlled study of operative versus non operative treatment for large spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurol India. 2017;65(4):752–8.
  3. Hemphill JC 3rd, Greenberg SM, Anderson CS, Becker K, Bendok BR, Cushman M, et al. Guidelines for the managements of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhages. A guideline for health care professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015;46(7):2032–60.
  4. Van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJA, Van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988;19(5):604–7.
  5. Kaya I, Cingoz ID, Uzunoglu I, Kizmazoglu C, Aydin HE, Yuceer N. Predictors of mortality in patients with surgically treated intracranial hemorrhage. Turk J Neurol. 2019;25(4):214–7.
  6. Behle B, Beseoglu K, Beez T, Petridis AK, Fischer I, Hanggi D, et al. Profile and prognosis of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: comparison of 6 months survival with STICH II and the MISTIE III lobar hemorrhage subset. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2022;83(1):20–6.
  7. Farhlstrom A, Tobieson L, Redebrandt HN, Zeberg H, Bartek JJ, Bartley A, et al. Differences in neurosurgical of treatment intracerebral hemorrhage: a nation-wide observational study of 578 consecutive patients. Acta Neurochir. 2019;161(5):955–65.
  8. Sarkar S, Dey A, Hossen MK, Sarkar S. The functional outcome of spontaneous hypertensive supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage after surgery. Integr J Med Sci. 2020;7:1–5.
  9. Hansen BM, Morgan TC, Betz JF, Sundgren PC, Norrving B, Hanley DF, et al. Intraventricular exiension of supratentorial intacerebral hemorrhage: the modified Grab scale improves outcome prediction in Lund stroke register. Neuroepidemiology. 2016;46:43–50.
  10. Hedge A, Menon G, Kumar V, Prasad GL, Kongwad LI, Nair R, et al. Clinical profile and predictors of outcome in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage from a tertiary care centre in South India. Stroke Res Treat. 2020;2020:1–8.
  11. Hessington A, Tsitsopoulos PP, Fahlstrom A, Marklund N. Favorable clinical outcome following surgical evacuation of deep-seated and lobar supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage: a retrospective single-center analysis of 123 cases. Acta Neurochir. 2018;160(9):1737–47.
  12. Hanley DF, Thompson RE, Rosenblum M, Yenokyan G, Lane K, McBee N, et al. Minimally invasive surgery with thrombolysis in intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation (MISTIE) III: a randomized, controlled, open-label phase 3 trial with blinded endpoint. Lancet. 2019;393(10175):1021–32.
  13. De Haven A, Joyce E, Yaghi S, Ansari S, Delic A, Taussky P, et al. End-of-treatment intracerebral aand intraventricular hemorrhage volume predicts outcome, a secondary analysis of MISTIE III. Stroke. 2020;51(2):652–4.
  14. Polster SP, Penagos JC, Lyne SB, Gregson BA, Cao Y, Thompson RE, et al. Intracerebral hemorrhage volume reduction and timing of intervention versus functional benefit and survival in the MISTIE III and STICH trials. Neurosurgery. 2021;88(5):961–70.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15395/mkb.v54n3.2788

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 316 times
PDF - 300 times

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


 


Creative Commons License
MKB is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

 


View My Stats