Paradoxical Hemiparesis from Cerebellopontine Angle Tumor: A Case Report

James Gunawan, Maula Nuruddin Gaharu

Abstract


Objective: To report a vestibular schwannoma in the cerebellopontine angle presenting with paradoxical hemiparesis with the Kernohan-Woltman Notch Phenomenon (KWNP).

Methods: A 31-year-old female presented to the neurology clinic at Bhayangkara Hospital TK. I R. Said Sukanto, Indonesia, on 29 November 2021 with loss of balance, hearing, vision, and weakness in her left arm and leg. On physical examination, the patient had reduced left arm and leg muscle strengths against resistance (MRC grade 4), face deviation to the left, abnormal finger-to-nose test, dysdiadochokinesia, and inability to perform tandem gait. She was admitted for a brain MRI but did not return to the hospital for re-evaluation and surgery. 

Results: The brain MRI showed a mass on the left side of the cerebellum with a size of 4.44x3.93x4.93 cm, suggesting vestibular schwannoma. The mass also caused the obliteration of the ventricle, causing hydrocephalus.

Conclusion:KWNP is an unusual finding resulting in a paradoxical hemiparesis, a false-localizing neurologic sign. Physicians should recognize KWNP in patients with hemiparesis, especially in space-occupying lesions. Imaging studies can help localize the lesion to minimize misdiagnosis and optimize patient treatment.

 


Keywords


Cerebellopontine Angle; Kernohan-Woltman Notch Phenomenon; Paradoxical Hemiparesis; Vestibular Schwannoma

Full Text:

PDF

References


  1. Carrasco-Moro R, Castro-Dufourny I, Martínez-San Millán JS, Cabañes-Martínez L, Pascual JM. Ipsilateral hemiparesis: the forgotten history of this paradoxical neurological sign. Neurosurg Focus. 2019;47(3):E7. doi:10.3171/2019.6.FOCUS19337
  2. Jang SH, Seo YS. Ipsilateral Hemiparesis Following Epidural Hematoma in a Patient With Traumatic Brain Injury. Ann Rehabil Med. 2019;43(3):352–4. doi:10.5535/arm.2019. 43.3.352
  3. Ropper AH, Samuels MA, Klein JP, Prasad S. eds. Adams and Victor’s Principles of Neurology, 11th ed. McGraw Hill; 2019. p . 386.
  4. Zhang CH, DeSouza RM, Kho JS, Vundavalli S, Critchley G. Kernohan-Woltman notch phenomenon: a review article. Br J Neurosurg. 2017 Mar 4;31(2):159–66. doi:10.1080/02688697.2016.1211250
  5. Gimarc K, Massagli TL. Kernohan-Woltman notch phenomenon in two patients with subdural hematoma and ipsilateral hemiparesis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 1;99(12):1195–6. doi:10.1097/PHM.0000000000001427
  6. Ahmed F, Shamim MS, Ali SA. Kernohan–woltman notch phenomenon: case report and review of literature. Pakistan Journal of Neurological Sciences (PJNS). 2017;12(3)44–6.
  7. Laaidi A, Hmada S, Naja A, Lakhdar A. Kernohan Woltman notch phenomenon caused by subdural chronic hematoma: Systematic review and an illustrative case. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022;79:104006. doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104006
  8. Saada F, Antonios N. Existence of Ipsilateral Hemiparesis in Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke: Two Case Reports and Review of the Literature. Eur Neurol. 2014;71(1–2):25–31. doi:10.1159/000356510
  9. Simonin A, Levivier M, Nistor S, Diserens K. Kernohan’s notch and misdiagnosis of disorders of consciousness. BMJ Case Rep. 2014;2014:bcr2013202094. doi:10.1136/bcr-2013-202094
  10. Kernohan JW, Woltman HW. Incisura of the crus due to contralateral brain tumor. Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1929;21(2):274–87. doi:10.1001/archneurpsyc.1929.02210200030004
  11. Lee JH, Kang MR, Kim SJ, Yoo BG, Kim EG, Ji KH. Kernohan-Woltman notch phenomenon caused by a traumatic epidural hematoma. J Neurosonol Neuroimag 2019; 11(2):182–5. https://doi.org/10.31728/jnn.2019.00072
  12. Carrasco R, Pascual JM, Navas M, Martínez-Flórez P, Manzanares-Soler R, Sola RG. Kernohan-Woltman notch phenomenon caused by an acute subdural hematoma. J Clin Neurosci. 2009;16(12):1628–31. doi:10.1016/j.jocn. 2009.02.015
  13. Natali AL, Reddy V, Bordoni B. Neuroanatomy, corticospinal cord tract. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; August 14, 2023.
  14. Tomita T, Grahovac G. Cerebellopontine angle tumors in infants and children. Childs Nerv Syst. 2015;31(10):1739–50. doi:10.1007/s00381-015-2747-x
  15. Memari F, Hassannia F, Reza Abtahi SH. Surgical outcomes of cerebellopontine angle tumors in 50 cases. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;27(78):29–34.
  16. Panigrahi S, Mishra SS, Das S. Primary cerebellopontine angle glioblastoma in an adult. Asian J Neurosurg. 2017;12(1):62–4. doi:10.4103/1793-5482.145323
  17. Chamoun R, MacDonald J, Shelton C, Couldwell WT. Surgical approaches for resection of vestibular schwannomas: translabyrinthine, retrosigmoid, and middle fossa approaches. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;33(3):E9. doi:10.3171/ 2012.6.FOCUS12190
  18. Rauniyar S, Gu J, Wang L, Shen Z, Meng Q, Xie S, et al. Cerebellopontine angle tumors: surgical and non-surgical outcomes in a cohort 321 cases. Acta Sci Neurol. 2020;3(6):59–74.
  19. Raheja A, Bowers CA, MacDonald JD, Shelton C, Gurgel RK, Brimley C, et al. Middle fossa approach for vestibular schwannoma: good hearing and facial nerve outcomes with low morbidity. World Neurosurg. 2016;92:37–46. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2016.04.085
  20. de Boer NP, Koot RW, Jansen JC, et al. Prognostic factors for the outcome of translabyrinthine surgery for vestibular schwannomas. Otol Neurotol. 2021;42(3):475–82. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000002980




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15850/ijihs.v11n2.2947

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 293 times
PDF - 148 times


 

This Journal indexed by

                   

 


Creative Commons License
IJIHS is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License



View My Stats