Viability Test of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Bacteria Stored in Various Cryopreservation Periods

Jessi Annisa, Neng Rina Susilawati, Shinta Asarina, Muti'ah Nurul Jihadah, Lidya Chaidir

Abstract


Background: The specimen storage room serves as bioarchive for prospective research purposes. Cryopreservation or preservation at very low temperatures has been used to preserve research isolates for decades. A quality assessment must be conducted to ensure the isolates conditions. This study aimed to assess the quality of isolates by testing the level of viability and contamination from different cryopreservation periods.

Methods: This was an experimental study with a total sample of 92 Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) isolates which were sampled randomly using cryopreservation, aged 8–10 years (in Tryptic Soy Broth media, TSB/) and aged 3–5 years (in Middlebrook 7H9) which was re-cultured in Ogawa Medium at the Tuberculosis Laboratory, Universitas Padjadjaran in May–November 2019. After observing confluent growths, the pure isolate was stained using the Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) method to confirm the presence of Mtb growth or contamination. A Simple ratio was used to count the recovery rate as a viability parameter and contamination rate of each batch.

Results: Test results showed a recovery rate of 66.67–100% of positive cultures stored despite they had been cryopreserved for 10 years. There was no significant difference in the percentage of positive cultures between preservation period groups.

Conclusion: Mtb isolates can survive and remain viable after being stored for up to 10 years at -80 ° C in cryopreservation media.


Keywords


bioarchive, cryopreservation, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, viability

Full Text:

PDF

References


  1. WHO. Global tuberculosis report 2021. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.
  2. Jang TH, Park SC, Yang JH, Kim JY, Seok JH, Park US, et al. Cryopreservation and its clinical applications. Integr Med Res. 2017;6(1):12–8.
  3. Whaley D, Damyar K, Witek RP, Mendoza A, Alexander M, Lakey JR. Cryopreservation: an overview of principles and cell-specific considerations. Cell Transplant. 2021;30:963689721999617.
  4. Savitskaya MA, Onishchenko GE. Apoptosis in cryopreserved eukaryotic cells. Biochemistry (Mosc). 2016;81(5):445–52.
  5. Chang T, Zhao G. Ice inhibition for cryopreservation: materials, strategies, and challenges. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2021;8(6):2002425.
  6. Shu Z. Development of optimal biopreservation methods and technology for cellular therapy and clinical diagnosis [Dissertation]. Washington: University of Washington; 2013.
  7. Měřička P, Janoušek L, Benda A, Lainková R, Sabó J, Dalecká M, et al. Cell viability assessment using fluorescence vital dyes and confocal microscopy in evaluating freezing and thawing protocols used in cryopreservation of allogeneic venous grafts. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(19):10653.
  8. Pacchiarotti J, Ramos T, Howerton K, Greilach S, Zaragoza K, Olmstead M, et al. Developing a clinical-grade cryopreservation protocol for human testicular tissue and cells. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:930962.
  9. Huang TS, Chen YS, Lee SS, Tu HZ, Liu YC. Preservation of clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex directly from MGIT culture tubes. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2005;35(4):455-8.
  10. Bhandari R, Gaur DS, Kotwal A, Kusum A. Comparison of Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) staining and fluorescent (FL) staining in suspected cases of tuberculosis. Int J Pathol Clin Res. 2021;7:122.
  11. Bouzid F, Osman DA, Baptiste E, Delerce J, Hassan MO, Arreh WI, et al. Pulmonary isolation of multidrug resistant “Mycobacterium simulans” and Mycobacterium tuberculosis from a patient in the Horn of Africa. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):15341.
  12. Palange P, Narang R, Kandi V. Evaluation of culture media for isolation of mycobacterium species from human clinical specimens. Cureus. 2016;8(8):e757.
  13. Bhattacharya S. Cryoprotectants and their usage in cryopreservation process. In: Bozkurt Y, editor. Cryopreservation biotechnology in biomedical and biological sciences. London: InTechOpen; 2018. p. 7–19.
  14. Sieme H, Oldenhof H, Wolkers WF. Mode of action of cryoprotectants for sperm preservation. Animal Reprod Sci. 2016;169:2-5.
  15. Whaley D, Damyar K, Witek RP, Mendoza A, Alexander M, Lakey JR. Cryopreservation: An overview of principles and cell-specific considerations. Cell Transplant. 2021;30: 963689721999617.
  16. Giampaglia CM, de Brito AC, Martins MC, Ueki SY, Latrilha FO, de Oliveira RS, et.al. Maintenance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis on glass beads. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2009;39(1):51–4.
  17. Ikuta CY, Ambrosio SR, Souza Filho AF, Grisi-Filho JH, Heinemann MB, Ferreira Neto JS, et.al. Cryopreservation of Mycobacterium bovis isolates. Semina-Ciencias Agrarias. 2016;37(5 Suppl 2): 3701-3708.
  18. Shu Z, Weigel KM, Soelberg SD, Lakey A, Cangelosi GA, Lee KH, et.al. Cryopreservation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex cells. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(11):3575-80.
  19. Bojic S, Murray A, Bentley BL, Spindler R, Pawlik P, Cordeiro JL, et.al. Winter is coming: the future of cryopreservation. BMC Biol. 2021;19(1):56.
  20. Hunt CJ. Technical considerations in the freezing, low-temperature storage and thawing of stem cells for cellular therapies. Transfus Med Hemother. 2019;46(3):134–50.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15850/amj.v11n1.2949

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 213 times
PDF - 55 times



 This Journal indexed by

                  

          

 

Creative Commons License
AMJ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

 


View My Stats