Reversal Reaction in Leprosy Patients: Study on Prevalence, Sociodemographic Characteristics, and Precipitating Factors at  a Tertiary Referral Hospital in West Java, Indonesia

Hendra Gunawan; Risa Miliawati; Renasha Firda Hanannisa

doi:10.15850/amj.v9n1.2329

Reversal Reaction in Leprosy Patients: Study on Prevalence, Sociodemographic Characteristics, and Precipitating Factors at a Tertiary Referral Hospital in West Java, Indonesia

Hendra Gunawan, Risa Miliawati, Renasha Firda Hanannisa

Abstract

Background: Heretofore, leprosy remains one of the most stigmatizing diseases with serious social consequences. Patients with leprosy might develop inflammatory reactions that interrupt with stable and chronic disease which are called leprosy reactions. Type 1 leprosy reactions, also known as reversal reactions (RR), are caused by immune responses that initially decreases, then “reverses” to become more intense, leading to considerable disability. The aim of this study was to identify the prevalence, sociodemographic characteristics, and precipitating factors of reversal reaction in leprosy patients.

Methods: This was a retrospective study with a cross-sectional design, with an approach to collecting data from the medical records of the Leprosy Clinic, Department of Dermatology and Venereology Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung West Java, during January 2015–December 2019.

Results: The results showed that 53 patients (24.7%) of the total 214 leprosy patients experienced a reversal reaction. The most frequent type of leprosy with reversal reaction was borderline lepromatous (BL) (56.5%). Most of the patients were male (68%), aged between 25–44 years (47.2%), unemployed patients (35.8%), and the last education was senior high school (71.7%). Physical stress was suspected as the most precipitating factor in reversal reaction patients (50.9%).

Conclusions: The prevalence of leprosy patients with reversal reaction in a Tertiary Referral Hospital West Java, Indonesia is 24.7%, with various characteristics based on sociodemographic. Physical stress is suspected as the most precipitating factor of RR in leprosy patients. Early diagnosis of reversal reaction is important to prevent nerve damage and disability.

Keywords

Leprosy, patient’s sociodemographic, prevalence, reversal reaction

Full Text:

PDF

References

Kumar B, Kar HK, editors. IAL textbook of leprosy. 2nd ed. New Delhi, India: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2016.

de Freitas MRG, Said G. Leprous neuropathy. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;115:499–514.

World Health Organization. Global leprosy update, 2018: moving towards a leprosy-free world. Weekly Epidemiological Record. 2019;94(35/36):389–412.

Pusat Data dan Informasi Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Infodatin kusta 2018: hapuskan stigma dan diskriminasi terhadap kusta. Jakarta: Pusat Data dan Informasi Kementerian Kesehatan RI; 2018.

World Health Organization. Leprosy hansen disease: management of reactions and prevention of disabilities: technical guidance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020.

Bhat RM, Prakash C. Leprosy: an overview of pathophysiology. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2012;2012:181089.

Bilik L, Demir B, Cicek D. Leprosy reactions. In: Ribón W, editor. Hansen’s diseases: the forgotten and neglected diseases. London, UK: IntechOpen Ltd; 2019.

Chhabra N, Bhattacharya SN, Singal A, Ahmed RS, Verma P. Profile of oxidative stress in response to treatment for type 1 leprosy reaction. Lepr Rev. 2015;86(1):80–8.

Naafs B, van Hees CLM. Leprosy type 1 reaction (formerly reversal reaction). Clin Dermatol. 2016;34(1):37–50.

Sung SM, Kobayashi TT. Diagnosis and treatment of leprosy type 1 (reversal) reaction. Cutis. 2015;95(4):222–6.

Nery JAdaC, Filho FB, Quintanilha J, Machado AM, Oliveira SdeSC, Sales AM. Understanding the type 1 reactional state for early diagnosis and treatment: a way to avoid disability in leprosy. An Bras Dermatol. 2013;88(5):787–92.

Chaitanya VS, Lavania M, Nigam A, Turankar RP, Singh I, Horo I, et al. Cortisol and proinflammatory cytokine profiles in type 1 (reversal) reactions of leprosy. Immunol Lett. 2013;156(1–2):159–67.

Sari LPVC, Darmada IGK. Prevalensi dan karakteristik penderita reaksi kusta tipe 1 di Poliklinik Kulit dan Kelamin RSUP Sanglah periode Januari–Desember 2014. E-Jurnal Medika Udayana. 2018;7(11):44088.

Pratamasari MA, Listiawan MY. Retrospective study: type 1 leprosy reaction. Berkala Ilmu Kesehatan Kulit dan Kelamin. 2015;27(2):137–43.

Rao SM, Moodalgiri VM.. Leprosy in a tertiary care hospital, Bagalkot, India: clinical study and a reappraisal in the post-elimination era. Medica Innovatica. 2015;4(2):23–8.

Suchonwanit P, Triam Chaisri S, Wittayakornrerk S, Rattanakaemakorn P. Leprosy reaction in Thai Population: a 20-year retrospective study. Dermatol Res Pract. 2015;2015:253154.

Dabrera TME, Tillekeratne LG, Fernando MSN, Kasturiaratchi STK, Østbye T. Prevalence and correlates of leprosy in a high-risk community setting in Sri Lanka. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2016;28(7):586–91.

Pescarini JM, Strina A, Nery JS, Skalinski LM, de Andrade KVF, Penna MLF, et al. Socioeconomic risk markers of leprosy in high-burden countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(7):0006622.

Ramadhona A, Supriyanto S, Martini S. Prevention effort of leprosy reactions based on risk factor analysis at Sumberglagah Leprosy Hospital Mojokerto. KnE Life Sci. 2018;4(9):161–71.

Sharma N, Patel NM, Mahakal N. Lepra reactions clinical & histopathological study. IJSR. 2013;2(1):185–6.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15850/amj.v9n1.2329